|
Michael Webster: Publisher/Editor. Contact
Us:
mvwsr@aol.com (949) 494-7121 (800) 376-4424
www.michaelwebster.net
THE
WORLD'S OLDEST ON-LINE NEWS & INFORMATION SOURCE
DEDICATED TO RAISING
PUBLIC AWARENESS WITH FREE EXPRESSION
Home-Grown Design Ok’d
for Parking
By RANDY
KRAFT
City
Council last week approved an alternative design of the
proposed downtown parking structure, based on a
recommendation by Laguna residents.
The
revised design includes a smaller structure set back
further from the street, with adequate parking and more
park space.
The new
model, by architects Studio One Eleven of Long Beach,
takes off from an alternate design by landscape
architect, Ann Christoph, and also addresses concerns
expressed by town parking and traffic committee member,
Vic Opincar.
Mayor
pro-tem Jane Egly thanked Christoph and Opincar for
“tickling your design talents.”
The
revision, which meets the Council’s basic goals for
parking capacity and corporate yard functions, has a
smaller footprint, includes ground level open-air
spaces, and is set back farther from the creek,
permitting more park space.
“I’m
happy that there is more space around the creek and the
smaller size of the parking structure,” Christoph said.
Christoph also expressed gratitude that mature
eucalyptus trees would be preserved, with the added
benefit of reducing the visual impact of the structure
from the street.
However
the new design is also more complicated to build because
of sloped ramps, according to lead architect, Allen
Pullman, and will just meet Council’s directive for 580
parking spaces.
An
additional 17 spaces will accommodate city hall parking.
The
previous design had the potential for as many as 667
spots.
Pullman
said that Christoph’s plan required tweaking because the
traffic flow was cumbersome, but that the essence of the
plan was sound.
At his
presentation to Council, Pullman expressed
appreciation to Christoph for taking the initiative, and
said that her design was “a good plan to build on.”
Although
Christoph endorsed the new design overall, she said she
would like to see the structure staked now, to more
fully evaluate the impact. The city does not require
staking until the project goes to design review.
A
minimum of 580 parking stalls has been the Council’s
battle cry and, given a 20-spot margin of error in final
design, the current plan may not meet that number.
However,
capacity figures are hypothetical and arbitrary at this
point, as a parking study has not yet been implemented.
The original project proposal included just 400 spaces.
Everyone
in town knows that parking is a critical issue,
especially in the summer months; the question is how
many new spots are needed and whether a structure of
this size is the best alternative year-round.
City
staff has recommended a parking study to consider
pedestrian and peak-hour vehicular traffic, as well as
an analysis of congestion for arts events such as the
pageant and theater productions.
Council
member Elizabeth Schneider has pushed hard for as many
spaces as possible. As a result, the preliminary design
required a 70,000 square foot facility. The new version
is 56,000 square feet and meets the city’s 35 foot
height limit.
Most
importantly, the revised design avoids building over the
sewer pump station, which has been a sticking point all
along, and makes maintenance traffic easier.
“That
was my major concern,” says council member Kelly Boyd,
who has consulted with Opincar on the project. “If we
cover that pump station we are asking for trouble.”
The
draft environmental impact report was finalized and
released for public view in January and city staff are
currently gathering responses and documenting proposed
mitigations.
The
village entrance is meant to serve as a gateway to the
city and provide parking for the downtown and civic arts
district, including the festivals and the playhouse.
Expansion plans for the playhouse were not included in
the draft EIR.
Staff
has also recommended preparation of a preliminary
construction staging plan.
According to community development director John
Montgomery, plans for the parking study are underway and
he hopes for completion early in 2008.
Construction costs for the village entrance have not
been established and financing remains a key question.
There is currently no budget nor funds set aside beyond
$250,000 approved for the next round of studies, which
will include cost estimates, financing options, and
development of the final EIR. |