Prisons: America's
Growth Industry
Thursday, January
28, 2010
By Alan Bisbort
istock photo
Inside the borders
of the United States
resides a separate
nation of 2.3
million people. It's
a nation in constant
flux, with 700,000
residents released
each year, their
places soon taken by
700,000 others. It's
a land where the
meals are free but
the doors are always
locked. Often, the
same people keep
returning to this
nation, while others
who've been there
before are released,
creating an awful
human churning
effect that baffles
social scientists,
hamstrings mayors,
breaks municipal
budgets and
overwhelms the
ability of
do-gooders to
adequately address.
I speak, of course,
of America's prison
population.
Incarceration may be
the only U.S.
industry that enjoys
unlimited growth
potential. We lead
the world, by a wide
margin, in the
number of citizens
in prison. The per
capita rate is six
times higher than
Canada, eight times
that of France, and
even surpasses China
and Russia.
According to
Georgetown law
professor David
Cole, a new prison
opens every week
somewhere in
America, a truly
insane statistic
that prompted him to
suggest, "We
literally cannot
afford our political
addiction to
incarceration."
*
It was not always
thus. In 1975, the
rate of
incarceration in the
U.S. was 100 per
100,000 people, a
rate that hadn't
fluctuated much in
the previous half
century. As
knee-jerk humanist
as this may seem to
the hardboiled
politics of the new
millennium, prison
rehabilitation
programs appeared to
have been working.
That is, recidivism
was not a guarantee.
You still had a
fighting chance if
you screwed up and
landed in a jail
cell (as long as
your crime did not
involve violence) to
get back on your
feet on the outside.
And even after 1975,
though the
incarceration rate
slowly climbed to
its present-day 700
per 100,000, Cole
suggests that
Americans did not
commit crimes at any
higher rate than
previously; the
United States simply
grew more punitive.
The change can be
summed up by a
single word: Drugs.
Since Pres. Reagan
declared a "war on
drugs" in 1982, drug
arrests have
increased 1,100
percent. Eighty
percent of all
arrests are drug
related; 80 percent
of the prison
sentences for "drug
offenses" are for
possession of drugs
(read: non-violent
users, not dealers).
If the goal of the
war on drugs was to
reduce use and
availability, we
have lost. Drugs are
more readily
available and more
dangerous than ever
before. Connecticut
is not spared
casualties in this
war.
"Most people look at
incarceration as
black and brown
people being put in
cells, but 80
percent of those who
die from illegal
drugs in this state
are white, either
through overdoses or
complications from
drug dependency,"
says Clifford
Thornton, director
of the
Hartford-based
Efficacy, a group
advocating drug
policy reform. "Most
people don't want to
believe this. But it
is basic knowledge.
... The war on drugs
has been a failure
on all levels but
most obviously on an
economic level. We
are on the very
precipice of having
the Mexican cartel
bringing their drug
war into the U.S.
It's already here in
Connecticut."
Connecticut has
17,000 prison
inmates with another
50,000 on parole,
says Thornton, a
former candidate for
state governor. He
said, "Black and
Latino men make up
less than six
percent of [the
state's] population
but account for 68
percent of the
prison population,
and 70 percent are
in prison for
drug-related
charges. It costs
$600 million a year
to operate the state
prison system. That
money could be
better spent. The
war on drugs is
nothing but a game.
To continue this
game is crazy."
Thornton advocates a
comprehensive series
of reforms that
would "bring drugs
under legal
control." He will
soon unveil a
"restorative
justice" program
that he hopes to
make part of the
ongoing debate in
the 2010 governor's
race. Check
efficacy-online.org
for updates and a
variety of
statistical
evidence.